MV Agusta Forum banner

1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,382 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
Just had my MV 1000 S placed on the dyno today. its making 165 BHP, be interested to know how it compares with other 1000 S model.
 

·
Living the Dream
Joined
·
2,759 Posts
That is the exact number my bike put down when i had it dynoed. Have fun with all those ponies! :f4:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,321 Posts
mine must be shit then x bikes did mine n i think it was 155bhp!!!! with race filter exhausts n power commander!!! unless me memory is failing me!!!are u there chris?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,448 Posts
Mine was 162 I think after fitting the BMC filter, Ti zorsts and removing the cat.
 

·
Living the Dream
Joined
·
2,759 Posts
I also should have listed my mods, exhaust, ceramic coated from headers back, BMC filter, no cat, powercomander and custom map.

What do you guys think of going back and having another map done when the bike has more miles on it. Will that produce more power or allow for a better tune?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,756 Posts
devilboy said:
mine must be shit then x bikes did mine n i think it was 155bhp!!!! with race filter exhausts n power commander!!! unless me memory is failing me!!!are u there chris?
it's not shit mate, i have a 5% descrepency here on my dyno which i'm trying to get sorted but basically every bike i run shows 5% down. i tested a few bikes back to back with a dyno truck here and we came in at exactly 5% out every time.

do the quick maths on yours and it puts it at around 163bhp:) so about right.

the descrepency is down to a software glitch over correcting the drum and eddy current mass, however because i've set so many biks up with this problem i'm not sure whether to get it fixed or just notify everyone at the time, if i get it fixed then every bike that i have run previous to getting it fixed becomes useless and that could mean ruling out maybe a thousand bikes or so...........the whole lot becomes pointless uncomparable data, not too keen on losing that amount of information for the sake of some numbers on a graph.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,588 Posts
163 I think. With RG3 and Rapid Bike. Without it was exactly the same, but with the power curve and torque curve were much higher all the way except at the top.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,321 Posts
yea now i remember u saying , told ya im gettin old n memory fades lol still blasted a zx10 goin to sherburn cafe a few weeks ago, didnt half make him jump!!!!! gave me a dark look when he came into car park a few mins after me n saw it was a lil old dude that had zapped him hehe hehe
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,292 Posts
nicensleazy said:
Just had my MV 1000 S placed on the dyno today. its making 165 BHP, be interested to know how it compares with other 1000 S model.
Was this a completely stock bike? If so, the dyno is reading very high.

I'm not going to give a "dyno 101" class but drivetrain loss is either non existant on your bike or the dyno is reading about 12-15% high.

MV claims 166 crank hp for that bike....drivetrain loss of 12-15% should give a reading of 144 -151 RWHP.

So, without a chart to see what kind of dyno, what gear the pull was done in, correction factor used, rear tire pressure what mods done etc. it is hard to compare.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,382 Posts
Discussion Starter #10
airfuel said:
Was this a completely stock bike? If so, the dyno is reading very high.

I'm not going to give a "dyno 101" class but drivetrain loss is either non existant on your bike or the dyno is reading about 12-15% high.

MV claims 166 crank hp for that bike....drivetrain loss of 12-15% should give a reading of 144 -151 RWHP.

So, without a chart to see what kind of dyno, what gear the pull was done in, correction factor used, rear tire pressure what mods done etc. it is hard to compare.


Full RG3's , cat removed with dyno and custom map.
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top