MV Agusta Forum banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Old Wing Nut
Joined
·
24,049 Posts
Either a really tired engine or a really tired dyno.....or the fueling is awful.

Or maybe a truthful dyno?? Dyno readings can vary a lot depending on type and operator. HP readings for bikes should only be compared when they are from the same dyno.

Ferraci's dynos are notoriously optimistic.....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,208 Posts
Stock for the 2000 is 126 at the crank if I remember correctly. I thought you usually loose about 15 between RWHP, so yeah seems low to me too. You shouldn't be loosing 30HP to final drive.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,195 Posts
If 126 at crank was published stock, then it sounds low. Most dynos put RWHP at 83-87% of crank, in my experience.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,769 Posts
It's low but not massively low. I've seen anywhere from 102 up to 108 bhp at the wheel from an evo1 f4.

They aren't the best engine with regards to power but they do respond well to tuning and you can creep them up to just under 130 at the wheel.

96 is low. What dyno was used?


:)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,195 Posts
If you get it you can change your signature to reflect that you own the lowest powered F4 in the forum. :loser:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
64 Posts
I'd recall German importers allso had a "Gentleman's agreement" on 100bhp limit back in the day, hence many a bike bought seecond hand from there could still be restricted.

Thank god that corrupt creep Martin Bangemann and his click did not succeed in getting such limit to be a part of EU legislation.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top