airfuel said:Depend on the dyno but a DynoJet dyno would most likely see about 120hp stock and hopefully 128hp with the mods. (rear wheel)
This is using the SAE correction factor and about 12% driveline loss.
4th gear pulls also,(industry norm) 5th gear will give inflated numbers.
This is real world wheel horsepower, not some "happy" dyno numbers.
STD, uncorrected or DIN numbers will be higher.
What do I win?
John T
I won !CB910 said:No prizes.... 'cause Cynthia didn't guess. She would have won a bike date.
Nidan was closest. Stock= 113. Yes, that surprised me too.
After= 125.
Super low numbers there......something must be wrong.rob said:I just put my f41000 on a dynojet dyno on tues night with rg3 and mid pipe and chip. It put out 130hp running no correction just straight rear wheel hp.
A ZX10r was running 127hp in comparison :flickoff:
What is difference between bhp and horsepower measured at the rear wheel? Superbike magazine had the Brutale 910 at 121 bhp. BTW, it looks like they put the Brutale's HP and Torque numbers on the Tuono dyno graph in that article. The number did not match the Tuono's graph and they were identicle to that of the Brutale.airfuel said:Super low numbers there......something must be wrong.
Every ZX10 I have done averages mid 150's at the rear wheel. (SAE correction)
Just goes to show that dyno numbers can't be compared from different machines.
John T
Oooh boy, You could write a thesis paper on horsepower, torque and the correction factors involved.anucci said:What is difference between bhp and horsepower measured at the rear wheel? Superbike magazine had the Brutale 910 at 121 bhp. BTW, it looks like they put the Brutale's HP and Torque numbers on the Tuono dyno graph in that article. The number did not match the Tuono's graph and they were identicle to that of the Brutale.
this one from a magazine:CB910 said:No prizes.... 'cause Cynthia didn't guess. She would have won a bike date.
Nidan was closest. Stock= 113. Yes, that surprised me too.
After= 125.