F4 RR is slower the F4... - MVAgusta.net
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-23-2011, 06:30 AM Thread Starter
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 9
F4 RR is slower the F4...

Fore those who love figures; although not important we all love them, unfortunately the values are represented in the European way.
It seems that the F4 RR is shorter geared for circuit use and therefore slower in topspeed then the standard F4.
You can also see the impressive aerodynamics of the standard F4, with 13% less power it is almost as fast as the BMW.

............................MV F4 RR...MV F4.....BMW
............................RR 2011.....2010....S1000RR

Measured power.....190,0....167,6....189,0
at rear wheel (HP)

Top speed (km/h)....289.......301.......305

Acceleration (sec)
0 to 100 km/h.........3,1........3,3.......3,1
0 to 140 km/h.........4,6........4,8.......4,4
0 to 200 km/h.........7,4........7,7.......6,9
0 to 250 km/h..........?........11,6......10,1

Picking up (sec)
060-100 km/h.........3,9........4,3.......3,5
100-140 km/h.........3,3........3,6.......3,3
140-180 km/h.........3,2........3,7.......3,2
150-250 km/h..........?.........10,7......8,3

Fuel consumption (l/100km)
Street......................6,6.........6,8.....5, 8
Top speed................?.........13,9.....14,2

All figures are measured ones by very reliable German magazine Motorrad.

PS
FYI I ride a 2010 F4 myself and find it ridiculously fast (enough) for the road.
ducastrada is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-23-2011, 10:23 AM
Senior Member
 
hyperF4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 643
for the money that the RR is, I'd just buy 2 bikes or a used Desmo (will be worth more later)
hyperF4 is offline  
post #3 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-23-2011, 10:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Mr. Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Athens, Ga. / Emeryville Ca.
Posts: 601
One of the very first things I did to my Y10 was gear it down, 520 Chain and Sprockets from EvolutionBike.
The bike's top speed is irrelevant on the street in most of America, and the lower gearing makes it better in the places you can use it. Plus mine's for the Track, so I got a whole range of 520 Sprockets.
Top Speed numbers are Fun tho. Everybody who doesnt ride bikes asks, not realizing you can just change final drive to increase it, unil wind resistance takes over.
Mr. Master is offline  
post #4 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-23-2011, 01:09 PM
Senior Member
 
The_castle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 7,343
Send a message via Skype™ to The_castle
O.K. I'm going to put the cat amongst the pigeons with this bold statement that puts may put things perspective in regards all of these top speed / power threads.
I'd rather ride on roads and tracks that look like picture on and two than three and four:
Attached Images
    
The_castle is offline  
post #5 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-23-2011, 01:31 PM
Senior Member
 
my10-jakarta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by ducastrada View Post
Fore those who love figures; although not important we all love them, unfortunately the values are represented in the European way.
It seems that the F4 RR is shorter geared for circuit use and therefore slower in topspeed then the standard F4.
You can also see the impressive aerodynamics of the standard F4, with 13% less power it is almost as fast as the BMW.

............................MV F4 RR...MV F4.....BMW
............................RR 2011.....2010....S1000RR

Measured power.....190,0....167,6....189,0
at rear wheel (HP)

Top speed (km/h)....289.......301.......305

Acceleration (sec)
0 to 100 km/h.........3,1........3,3.......3,1
0 to 140 km/h.........4,6........4,8.......4,4
0 to 200 km/h.........7,4........7,7.......6,9
0 to 250 km/h..........?........11,6......10,1

Picking up (sec)
060-100 km/h.........3,9........4,3.......3,5
100-140 km/h.........3,3........3,6.......3,3
140-180 km/h.........3,2........3,7.......3,2
150-250 km/h..........?.........10,7......8,3

Fuel consumption (l/100km)
Street......................6,6.........6,8.....5, 8
Top speed................?.........13,9.....14,2

All figures are measured ones by very reliable German magazine Motorrad.

PS
FYI I ride a 2010 F4 myself and find it ridiculously fast (enough) for the road.

as far i know HP from engine to rear wheel should drop around 15-20hp. Means both rr is exceed 200hp.

Those BMW acceleration figures are reliable. Almost the same with wikipedia.
my10-jakarta is offline  
post #6 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-24-2011, 03:07 AM Thread Starter
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 9
Wrong indication for RR power (Crackshaft instead of rear wheel)

Read the article again and gave wrong power indication for RR.

Max power for RR is 190HP at cranckshaft at 13.100 rpm (standard F4 181HP at 12.600 rpm).
Max torque for RR is 108Nm at 11.200 rpm (standard F4 is 111Nm at 9.200 rpm).

The 189HP of BMW are rear wheel ones (crackshaft = 204 HP at 13.200 rpm, 117Nm at 10.500rpm)...

BMW remains in a class of its own.
ducastrada is offline  
post #7 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-24-2011, 03:18 AM
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 91
I never believe in German magazines cause they always put German products first place.
badboy is offline  
post #8 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-24-2011, 03:58 AM
Senior Member
 
MikeF4Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 3,111
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_castle View Post
O.K. I'm going to put the cat amongst the pigeons with this bold statement that puts may put things perspective in regards all of these top speed / power threads.
I'd rather ride on roads and tracks that look like picture on and two than three and four:
Ha ha! Very good! +1...

Nulla tenaci invia est via
MikeF4Black is offline  
post #9 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-24-2011, 04:33 AM
Senior Member
 
adamv1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: melbourne australia
Posts: 2,323
Who cares....

BMW s1000rr:
2006 mv 1000 nero 3/21(sold)
adamv1000 is offline  
post #10 of 19 (permalink) Old 07-24-2011, 05:03 AM
Senior Member
 
rents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 968
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_castle View Post
O.K. I'm going to put the cat amongst the pigeons with this bold statement that puts may put things perspective in regards all of these top speed / power threads.
I'd rather ride on roads and tracks that look like picture on and two than three and four:
Whilst I agree with you that the fun part is all about the twisties, I'm also curious about performance figures of different bikes.

This is not from a "my bike is better than yours" point of view neither a make a choice on a particular bike due to numbers point of view - rather, an interest in the results different brands get from taking slightly different approaches to what ultimately are quite similar bikes - with respect to tyres, suspension, component layout, rider position, etc.

The numbers are not going to change my opinion on any bike, but I like to know purely due to being inquisitive.
rents is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to use all of the features of the MVAgusta.net site, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome