|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Thorn, Limburg, The Netherlands
Posts: 76
|
Now that my better half has seen the light and traded in her Cagiva Raptor for a Brutale S, coupled with my 910s, our fuel bills are getting silly.
now for the Questions; What is the best solution to improve the fuel consumption? Is fitting a power commander the best way to go, and if so which model, and is a Dyno run needed? Is there a cheaper option available? as long as it's not riding easier, which is almost impossible!! Both bikes have a midpipe and my 910s also has the MV Corse chip fitted. I hope someone can help for the sake of our bank balance!! Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: San Diego, north county
Posts: 369
|
I've noticed quite a difference when I run mine in normal/rain mode.
But what fun is that? LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: brisbane
Posts: 1,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: France
Posts: 1,147
|
My 910 R is great set up , with mv corse chip and pipe and runs 10 liters for 100 km regular riding.
When you ride harsh around 12 liters which is normal imho. It,s a bike with 152 hp from 909 cc , what did you except ? My bonnevile is tuned and has 80 hp out of 865cc and runs at 5.4 liters for 100 km. The more hp .... and brutties are thristy..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 9,270
|
Quote:
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Thorn, Limburg, The Netherlands
Posts: 76
|
Thanks Eddy. I'll have a good read at the link you highlighted.
I get about 170 km before the low fuel light comes on and am averaging around 12 liters to 100 km. Maybe I'm expecting too much from our Brutale's, but then again I am a stingy Scotsman!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
New Member
No MVs in the Registry Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Perth, West Aus
Posts: 16
|
I have recently fitted a Microtec to my R1090. After a bit of help and adjustment ironing out a few small issues, my ride at the weekend - country roads and freeway, so not much stop start from tank full to top up on the return was 172km, 10.3L. Speeds up to 160km/hr, mostly around 90-120km/hr. Much better throttle control in traffic. The tank before averaged about 7.6L/100km mainly around town. Might be worth considering.
Cheers Wayne |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Thorn, Limburg, The Netherlands
Posts: 76
|
I'm leaning towards getting a PC3 for both bikes. Are there downloadable maps for the 910s and 750 with midpipes?
I've also read that the ecu chip can be rewritten to give better fuel consumption, but I'm not sure where I can have this done and if it gives a good result. any info would be much appreciated. Cheers, Dave. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
![]() |
Madjock;
PM Adam, (merc07) for a chip he fixed the ignition and fuel maps the fans come on sooner too
__________________
The Forum Curmudgeon i'm not PC either ![]() Noel-theknurl ph. 310-540-4823 PST, GMT -8 email, PayPal; theknurl@yahoo.com Skype; theknurl |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Escondido
Posts: 721
|
2008 910R with full exhaust system, re-flashed ECU, air intake restrictors removed. Runs like a rapped ape. Never dynoed it but it absolutely keeps up with an equally set up Ducati 1098 Streetfighter. I set the CO level measured at the exhaust muffler to about 3.5%. That's on crappy, poisened, full of ethanol California 91 octane pump gas.
My 910R very consistently gets 25-26 mpg. That's about 9.2l - 9.5l/100km if my math is right. It almost doesn't seem to matter if I cruise freeways at 80-90mph or agressively ride in the twisties. |
|
|
|