f3 v 675 triumph in mcn today.
overall verdict is that the triumph is much better in normal conditions(everyday riding) but mv would be better on track!
usual mv faults are diagnosed . ie too extreme for road, raw motor, poorish gearbox, bad fuelling!!
good points are sounds good and looks good! and is better at roll on times than triumph and is faster in straight line.
so it looks to me like the usual dilemma for us mv fans!
i cant believe theyve spent so much time and money developing a bike that still has basic faults!
mvs testers must be useless!!
cant wait to see more tests and head to heads in mags but my mantra is as always.............test one for yourselves!!
i loved my f4 even with all its faults but i was hoping the f3 would be THE BIKE that would bring me back to the mv fold but the juries out at the moment.:ahhh:
overall verdict is that the triumph is much better in normal conditions(everyday riding) but mv would be better on track!
usual mv faults are diagnosed . ie too extreme for road, raw motor, poorish gearbox, bad fuelling!!
good points are sounds good and looks good! and is better at roll on times than triumph and is faster in straight line.
so it looks to me like the usual dilemma for us mv fans!
i cant believe theyve spent so much time and money developing a bike that still has basic faults!
mvs testers must be useless!!
cant wait to see more tests and head to heads in mags but my mantra is as always.............test one for yourselves!!
i loved my f4 even with all its faults but i was hoping the f3 would be THE BIKE that would bring me back to the mv fold but the juries out at the moment.:ahhh: